Zork White House

Just Adventure +

||  Adventure Links   ||  Archives  ||  Articles   ||  Independent Developers   ||  Interviews   ||   JA Forum   ||
||  JA Staff/Contacts   ||  The JAVE   ||  Letters   ||  Reviews   ||  Search   ||   Upcoming Releases   ||  Walkthroughs   ||
||  What's New / Home   || Play Games!  ||
Over 1 Million Visitors a Month!
Buy Games at Just Adventure+!

Articles

GameGuy: The "Racing Sim" Edition (Hint -We don't need another NASCAR Game.)
By Mark H. Walker

I have two great passions: Racing and gaming. In 1965, I saw Jim Clark (deceased Formula One World Champion) blast flat out through Spa’s famed Eau Rouge, and I was hooked. Although my taste in computer games is wider than the racing genre, I have never lost that passion for speed imbued by Clark’s deep green Lotus 33.

Whether the speed is real --ingested at the wheel of my ITB Corolla-- or simulated, matters not. What does, however, matter is the direction the games that simulate speed are taking --the future of racing simulations, so to speak. It’s a bright future, but that doesn’t mean it’s a good future. Let me explain.

The crystal ball is easily read. In the coming years we’ll see a never ending stream of simulations depicting two types of racing: NASCAR and the FIA Formula One World Championship. No doubt, the games will sell well. Americans buy the NASCAR simulations while the rest of the planet snaps up the Formula One games. Yeah, we’ll see the occasional GT3, TOCA 2, Viper Racing, or Sports Car GT, but if you don’t like NASCAR or F1, you’ll often be out of luck.

Innovation? Not here. Developers will continue to wow editors with better graphics and drivers with supposedly more realistic physics models, but the nature of the beast will remain the same. Hey, I like high-gloss, reflective-paint cars as well as the next guy (or gal), but does it really change the racing experience? And realistic? Puhlease don’t talk to me about realistic. Decreasing the surface traction coefficient and making the steering more sensitive does not qualify as realistic. Any coder can make a game impossible to drive.

Case in same-old-stuff point: Grand Prix 4 and Papyrus’s NASCAR Racing series. Grand Prix 4 is a solid game; Geoff Crammond has once again hit the game-engine sweet spot, making the Ferraris, Jordans, and McLarens a joy to pilot. The graphics, while not stunning, are at least pleasing. But that’s it, Grand Prix 4 feels like an updated version of Grand Prix II, nothing more. Nothing new.

By the same token, NASCAR 4 (or is it version 5 or 6? I’ve lost count) is little more than a prettier version of the original NASCAR Racing. I respect Dave Kaemmer; he is arguably the finest racing simulation coder/designer in the history of gaming, but Papyrus needs to give NASCAR a rest.

In essence, racing simulation’s bright future is the same old wine in a brand new bottle. The game boots, the gamer chooses practice, single race, or championship season, and the game plays. The cars are a bit more appealing than the game’s predecessor, but little else has changed.

But what of the other future, A.K.A. that good future? I’ve seen it, and it lives in games such older games as Monaco Grand Prix Racing 2, Dirt Track Racing, and NASCAR Heat. The good future consists of racing simulations that eschew either the tried and true NASCAR/Formula One series or present it in a unique manner, or both.

Yes, Monaco Grand Prix Racing 2 is another Formula One game, but it includes more options than a neophyte long-distance phone company. At the top of the list are the game’s scenarios. Why practice, qualify, and race when you can hop into the seat and drive a scripted scenario? These mini-races run the gamut, from helping a teammate win a championship to fighting off the competition on the final lap. They’re new, creative, and most of all, fun. Similarly, NASCAR Heat offers not only its Beat the Heat challenge scenarios, but Race the Pro, which allows gamers to pit their skills against actual hot laps laid down by Winston Cup drivers. On the flip side of the coin, Dirt Track Racing’s strength is its subject matter. Where else can you get the luscious feel of sliding sideways through the dirt at darn near 1000 miles per hour?

Unfortunately, we won’t see many unique racing venues from major publishers in the coming years. There isn’t a fan base to support it. What we can hope to see is a new face on the simulations we buy. A face that includes scenarios, laps against real pros, and other as of yet thought of innovations. The days of slapping 200 new pixels, a slightly enhanced physics engine, and the latest tracks into a box and calling it new are drawing to a close. Let’s merge racing simulations bright future with its good future and make a great future for gamers and publishers alike.

© Mark H. Walker, LLC 2002
Mark H. Walker is a veteran interactive entertainment journalist who has written over 40 books and designs games including his soon to be released Lock 'n Load.